Notice: Undefined index: c3v3BkGcUttqMBae in /home/leadningrays/public_html/wp-content/themes/course-builder/header.php on line 64

Notice: Undefined index: c4v3BkGcUttqMBae in /home/leadningrays/public_html/wp-content/themes/course-builder/header.php on line 81
Retraction Watch:Tracking retractions as a screen in to the process that is scientific – Learning Rays 
My Cart 0

Retraction Watch:Tracking retractions as a screen in to the process that is scientific

Retraction Watch:Tracking retractions as a screen in to the process that is scientific

Current Reviews

  • Professor Dr. Mohammad Tariqur Rahman on Happy birthday celebration, Retraction Watch: We’re turning nine
  • Regret on Pleased birthday, Retraction Watch: We’re turning nine
  • Lee Rudolph on Drug scientists trip up, raising meth paper to compose one on LSD

We’re on Facebook

Follow us on Twitter

Pleased birthday, Retraction Watch: We’re turning nine

Nine years back this Saturday that is coming August 3, 2010, we published a post, “Why write a web log about retractions?”

Just just just What is now clear within the intervening nine years is really what a rich vein retractions are as stories of what are the results whenever one thing goes incorrect in technology. So that as we now have done each year at the moment, we’ll review just just what took place within the last few 12 months.

Share this:

Drug researchers trip up, raising meth paper to compose one on LSD

Evidently meth is just a gateway drug … for publishing misconduct.

Scientists in Asia have forfeit a 2019 paper on what LSD can harm vision because they’d lifted a lot of the paper from articles which had showed up the season before in a unique log — about methamphetamine.

The retracted article, “Long-term systemic therapy with lysergic acid diethylamide causes retinal harm in CD1 mice,” starred in Human & Experimental Toxicology. Based on the article:

Share this:

Authors object as “doubtful” information doom dermatology paper

A dermatology log has retracted a 2017 article by a set of scientists in Saudi Arabia after finding a complaint that is“serious about the integrity associated with the data. Nevertheless the author that is first of paper pressed right right back, saying the move ended up being unjustified.

The content, “Successful use of blended corticosteroids and rituximab in someone with refractory polyarteritis that is cutaneous,” ended up being published by Ibrahim Al-Homood and Mohammad Aljahlan, rheumatologists at King Fahad healthcare City in Riyadh and starred in the Journal of Dermatology & Dermatologic operation. It described (with instead grisly images) the actual situation of the man that is 25-year-old serious leg ulcers that solved after the described combination treatment.

But at the notice describes, the paper can’t be trusted:

Share this:

Kyoto University suspends very first writer of https://www.writtingessays.com retracted Kumamoto quake paper

The initial composer of a paper that is now-retracted technology in regards to the aftereffects of the lethal 2016 Kumamoto earthquake in Japan happens to be suspended from their college place for starters 12 months.

Intending Lin, associated with Department of Geophysics at Kyoto University, ended up being sanctioned by the organization for misconduct stemming from their abuse of information and plagiarism into the 2016 paper:

Share this:

Sunday reads: A sleuth whoever work has resulted in a huge selection of retractions and modifications; an “unethical, dangerous and deceptive eye that is; genetics’ high retraction price

You enjoy our weekly roundup before we present this week’s Weekend Reads, a question: Do? In that case, we’re able to actually make use of your assistance. Could you look at a tax-deductible contribution to help Weekend Reads, and our day to day work? Many Thanks ahead of time.

Share this:

Forensics Friday: can you flag this paper if it had been under review?

Ever desired to hone your talent as being a sleuth that is scientific? Now’s your opportunity.

because of the United states Society for Biochemistry and Biology that is molecular(, which can be focused on educating writers on recommendations in publishing, figure planning, and reproducibility, we’re presenting the tenth in a set, Forensics Friday.

Have a look at the image below, and then simply take our poll. From then on, go through the website link below to learn the right solution.

Share this:

Cock and bull tale causes retraction of bovine herpesvirus paper

The ancients had thing for hybrids (think pets, perhaps maybe not vehicles): half goat-half people, horses with human being torsos, winged horses and lions, you receive the image. But a mix that is chicken-cown’t on that list … until now.

A small grouping of scientists in Brazil has lost a paper in a veterinary log for attempting to reuse information from a chicken research within their paper on herpesvirus infections in cattle.

This article, “Bovine Herpesvirus 5 promotes dysfunction that is mitochondrial cultured bovine monocyte-derived macrophages and not impact virus replication,” starred in February into the journal Veterinary Microbiology.

Share this:

‘Not biologically plausible’: questions about survey data make fluorosis paper a banner

A current article that provided a stark caution in regards to the dangers to kids of fluoride within the nation’s water is tagged with a manifestation of concern following the book of a fresh paper which undermines the dependability of this initial information.

The content, “Dental fluorosis trends in US dental health studies: 1986 to 2012,” starred in March in JDR Clinical & Translational analysis, a dental log. The very first writer on the paper is Christopher Neurath, for the United states Environmental wellness research Project, which advocates against fluoridation of water.

The content, that used data through the nationwide Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) when it comes to years 2011 and 2012, reported increases that are“large severity and prevalence” of fluorosis over that period — continuing a trend dating back to into the mid-1980s.

Based on the scientists:

Share this:

Gravitational areas, silkworm excrement, and “putor” programs: exactly How did this “pure, utter nonsense” get into in a journal that is peer-reviewed?

Often, a paper arrives that is therefore revolutionary, it defies description. Therefore as opposed to attempt to do justice to a paper that is recent Parasitology Research, we’ll replicate several paragraphs right right here:

Share this:

Leech paper nets phrase of concern

Articles claiming to uproot the evolutionary tree of leeches has gotten a manifestation of concern following a audience notified the log about prospective difficulties with the info.

This article, “Phylogenomic analysis of a putative link that is missing reinterpretation of leech evolution,” appeared online in Genome Biology and Evolution, an Oxford University Press name, on June 19 for this 12 months. Based on the writers — a team that is international includes scientists during the National Museum of Natural History, the new york Museum of Natural Sciences, Florida State University and University of Gothenburg in Sweden — their results:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I wanted to work in a Digital Agency, I was searching for courses that'll help me broaden my skill set. Before signing up for learningrays.

Send message

Gimme a message you have questions